arXiv has been a leader in scholarly communications since its launch in 1991, creating and sustaining one of the knowledge sector’s most important platforms for research exchange and discovery. Invest in Open Infrastructure (IOI) recently concluded an intensive 14-month project in support of arXiv leadership and governance with a focus on strategic planning and building toward operational excellence, funded by the Simons Foundation. IOI’s work with arXiv has sought to support and scaffold the arXiv community — its leadership, staff, governance voices, and volunteers — as it maps its future trajectory in a moment of great changes in national and international policy and practice.
As part of our wrap-up work this August, IOI held a roundtable conversation with three key arXiv voices:
- Licia Verde — Chair, arXiv Scientific Advisory Council; ICREA Research Professor at Universitat de Barcelona;
- Alex Kohls — arXiv Institutions Advisory Council; Group Leader Scientific Information Service at CERN; and
- Stephanie Orphan — arXiv Program Director
We probed into some of the ways arXiv’s evolution will help it expand its impact and fulfil its mission in the years ahead. We share excerpts from these conversations below.
We’ve seen many recent policy developments around open access such as the Nelson Memo from the Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP), guidance from cOAlition S calling for new models of knowledge sharing, and convergence on no-fee open access models, among others. What role does and can arXiv play in the evolving policy landscape?
We operate in an environment where growing attention is being paid to the need for public access to funded research, with private and public funders worldwide introducing policies that mandate and encourage this public access. Behind these emerging policies lies a fundamental goal: to facilitate knowledge sharing and accelerate the creation of new knowledge by making scientific information open and accessible in a timely manner.
For more than 30 years, arXiv has served as a mechanism for making free, open versions of research papers universally available. As the first and largest preprint server, arXiv has pioneered equitable access to scientific research through its preprint model. arXiv is therefore well-positioned to not only meet these policy requirements but also continue its role in democratizing knowledge. Unlike traditional publishing models, which can take months, arXiv's platform allows research papers to be available globally within hours of submission. This rapid dissemination not only accelerates scientific progress but also fosters scrutiny, collaboration, and discussion, as seen in research fields where journal clubs frequently discuss new arXiv preprints.
At the same time, the evolving policy landscape highlights a shift towards more holistic and inclusive knowledge-sharing models. Traditional fee-based open-access models, while increasing the accessibility of scientific content, have also unintentionally exacerbated inequities within the scientific community. arXiv’s open, community-driven approach is aligned with progressive policies that aim to build a more inclusive framework for knowledge sharing. The expertise and innovative model we developed over three decades will be instrumental in shaping a future knowledge-sharing ecosystem that prioritizes equity and is managed by the community it serves. arXiv's high-quality preprints, which document the evolution of research from preprint to postprint, are invaluable to researchers, but the role of peer review and journal scrutiny remains essential. arXiv complements this process by hosting both preprints and postprints, thus supporting open-access mandates.
In summary, arXiv stands not only as a testament to the success of equitable scientific communication but also as a vital component in the ongoing evolution toward a more inclusive, community-oriented knowledge-sharing paradigm.
arXiv is experiencing tremendous (and record-breaking) increases in traffic and use. Can you share examples with us about how arXiv has been managing these growth moments as the service scales (technical, organizational, editorial, or otherwise)?
The significant increase in traffic to arXiv is both a testament to its success and a challenge for the team. We strive to maintain high-quality, flexible operations that adapt to the evolving needs of the growing and diverse research communities that arXiv serves.
To address the technical challenges, the developers are currently migrating the entire infrastructure to a cloud-based solution, which offers much-needed scalability. We are also introducing more automated quality assurance checks, which will reduce the burden on staff and volunteer moderators. Notably, significant progress has been made on arXivcheck, a tool designed to improve the technical and quality checks process. arXivcheck offers a more user-friendly and option-rich interface, simplifying workflows for staff and moderators by consolidating tasks that previously required toggling between multiple platforms, thereby enhancing efficiency and the flow of staff-moderator interactions.
On the editorial front, arXiv faces the challenge of keeping pace with demand, as much of its operations rely on volunteers. To tackle this, we are actively expanding our volunteer network by actively engaging the community, including leveraging the Institutions Advisory Council, while also enhancing the technology infrastructure to streamline editorial processes.
In terms of governance, arXiv's 2023 reorganization was a key step in managing the platform's growing usage. A major change involved splitting the former Scientific Advisory Board into two councils: the Science Advisory Council and the Editorial Advisory Council (EAC). The EAC, comprised of Section Editorial Committee (SEC) chairs, focuses on content moderation policies and processes, with the EAC chair functioning as arXiv’s editor-in-chief. After an initially slow start, the EAC is now fully operational, with new SEC members and moderators being recruited. Roles and responsibilities are being clarified, which should make moderator recruitment, handling appeals, and resolving complex cases more efficient.
Moreover, while the number of staff working on the daily flow of papers has not increased, the composition of the Editorial and User Support team has changed. We now have three production editors (compared to just one and a part-time temp in 2023), alongside the head of content and user support and two support specialists. Larger technical support tasks are managed by the development team. This new staffing configuration has contributed to operational efficiencies, but keeping up with the growing number of submissions remains a challenge. The automation improvements have, in some cases, shifted the workload in new ways, creating an ongoing balancing act to ensure arXiv’s core mission of rapidly disseminating scientific research is fulfilled.
arXiv has a long history of community engagement and involvement. How have each of you been involved in arXiv’s extended community apparatus, and what recent improvements have been made to these structures?
Alex: My engagement with arXiv has been deeply rooted in its significance to the particle physics community, particularly within CERN where I work. Though I was not a member of arXiv's former governance structures, I enjoyed regular interactions with arXiv’s management through working groups and direct communications in an advisory role. These interactions were very rewarding for me as they allowed me to contribute to discussions on enhancing the platform's utility and reach within the scientific community.
More recently, my involvement took a more structured form when I participated in a working group tasked with advising arXiv's management on implementing a new governance model. This initiative was aimed at refining decision-making processes and ensuring that the governance structure aligns more closely with the needs of the community arXiv serves. Building on this experience, I was privileged to be invited to join the new Institutions Advisory Council. In this capacity, I am actively involved in supporting the arXiv team in expanding the partnerships. My focus is on engaging with potential new partners and stakeholders in particular in the particle physics community.
Licia: I lived the e-print revolution that arXiv has started and sustained. I dipped my toes in research when preprints were physically printed and shipped to other institutions around the world: if your institution was not on the mailing list, you were cut out. And with only one or two copies per institution, the pecking order in reading preprints was a big thing. The moment arXiv entered, that dynamic changed immediately: every morning, a whole new set of preprints would appear on the website (or their abstracts on your email inbox), and they remained available, searchable, readable, printable. I could just post my paper electronically without thinking who to send it to and how to prioritize to save on printer and stamps. Shortly after, if your paper was not in arXiv, effectively your paper did not exist. In 2015, I was invited to join what was then the arXiv Science Advisory Board. I have seen the number of documents in arXiv double more than once, and the number of monthly submissions hit new records more times than I can remember. This success and growth has put arXiv existing structures under strain. COVID was a turning point. The role of preprints during COVID is an important piece of history, but this, in retrospect, represented a tipping point for arXiv. The changes and improvements discussed above are the result of a process that jumpstarted back then.
Stephanie: As the program manager and relative newcomer to arXiv, I have primarily been involved with helping to shepherd the creation of a new governance structure and related processes. I have also had the pleasure of working regularly with the chairs of our advisory councils and interacting at varying levels with members of the three councils on day to day work as well as the roadmap work we developed with IOI. The degree of commitment and the amount of time that volunteers give to arXiv is impressive. As I mentioned previously, with our governance reorganization, we broke what had been a single group consisting of scientists from the broader community and those chairing arXiv sections into two distinct groups. This has provided better-defined roles and offered a clear path for dealing with issues that affect content moderation, which is an enormous undertaking that relies on hundreds of volunteers. I think it is important that arXiv has a governance structure that has representation beyond scientists and includes the Institutions Advisory Council, which represents the scholarly communications community, including librarians and information science and publishing professionals.
IOI’s strategic support work with you focused a lot of attention on arXiv’s sustainability, including the maturation of its fiscal structures and how these are used in planning and forecasting. Can you talk to us about some of the impact you hope this work will have on arXiv’s budgeting and fundraising directions ahead?
Alex: We all probably know the feeling when you are so deeply involved in a topic, that you lose oversight. In German, we have a saying, “Den Wald for lauter Bäumen nicht sehen” (you don’t see the forest of all the trees). This is the key benefit of having somebody external helping you.
IOI’s work encouraged the arXiv team and all advisory councils to take a step back, systematically and strategically assess the current status and develop concrete, structured approaches to address identified weaknesses and approach opportunities. At the end of the project, everybody felt engaged, and knew how to individually contribute to arXiv’s journey towards sustainability.
Licia: In my view, the arXiv idea is so revolutionary that existing legal, organizational structures (legal, organizational, financial, etc.) are not a good fit. arXiv is not a business nor a company. It is not strictly a not-for-profit organization, nor is it an academic institution. This presents a major challenge: for people outside of arXiv’s operation, arXiv remains somewhat hard to classify and identify. arXiv’s operation, therefore, seems to many somewhat “invisible” and nebulous. For example, the fact that arXiv relies very heavily on volunteers and is run on a shoestring budget is not obvious to outsiders. When the operation was small enough, the operational challenges could be overcome by (voluntary) actions of a single (genius, heroic, or both) individual. As arXiv grew and became as crucial “as the air we breathe” (Prof. Sumati Surya, SAC member) for more and more researchers around the globe, this modus operandi started becoming inadequate. Sustainability and especially financial sustainability is at the core of what arXiv needs to strive for next: it can enable arXiv’s operation to be more visible, to scale and to continue to enable researchers all around the world to “breathe”. I hope that with IOI’s support, a sustainable stream of funding for arXiv can be ensured.
Stephanie: The work we did with IOI that was focused on funding streams and structures was important and very informative. Through it I personally gained a deeper understanding of what is behind some of the less obvious line items in the arXiv budget, and we created a mechanism for forecasting budgets into the future. This work shone a light on possible future pitfalls as well as helping us to put real numbers around our future financial needs. It was also helpful to document our members and affiliates in a way that provides a clearer picture of giving over time and to get some tools to help us better approach giving campaigns going forward. While we are making progress on some fronts related to increasing revenue (for example, through successfully persuading some institutions to increase their giving and productive conversations with the Institutions Advisory Council on ways to modify the tiers), limited staffing combined with the need to keep up with ongoing activities has made it difficult to fully develop a plan to increase arXiv funding.
What has IOI’s strategic support services enabled arXiv to do differently or better than before?
Alex: IOI’s strategic support has been instrumental in transforming how arXiv approaches financial sustainability. IOI’s expertise helped us shift to a more structured and strategic outlook, focusing on long-term financial health. With the tools and guidance from IOI, we managed to get deeper financial insights, which were crucial in refining our strategies and developing new concepts to expand and diversify our funding base.
Furthermore, IOI proved to be an excellent sparring partner in the strategic planning process. The team was essential during working group sessions, helping us evaluate various options and scenarios. This collaborative effort was vital in ensuring that strategic decisions are well-rounded and forward-looking, preparing arXiv to meet future challenges and opportunities in the scholarly communication landscape.
Licia: Thanks to IOI’s support, arXiv has shifted its mindset from short-term planning to embracing a long-term strategy. The process guided by IOI has aligned stakeholders and has brought arXiv’s values and mission into sharper focus. This clarity has helped us set priorities and drive growth and change.
Stephanie: Partnering with an external group such as IOI was really helpful in terms of identifying arXiv’s core needs and areas of focus. My understanding is that past planning was handled within arXiv and did not include the broad range of perspectives that were included in the work with IOI. Having someone mediate sometimes difficult conversations and steer us back on track when discussions started to stray was also immensely helpful. Working with IOI introduced a more structured approach to identifying and moving forward on projects that are critical to arXiv’s ongoing success.
arXiv has navigated a number of leadership and department changes over the past few years. What lessons are you taking forward, and how would you coach others who are encountering similar change processes?
-
Open, transparent, and effective communication
- Communicate openly and in a timely manner with key stakeholders, both internally and (to the extent possible) externally, about challenges, planned changes, reorganizations, and ideas. This fosters more effective collaboration and hence leverages the strengths of all community members involved.
- Ensure the right communication channels are in place to deliver the right information to the right recipients, avoiding unnecessary details or omissions. Tailor the form of communication to the audience (e.g., technical jargons for tech teams) and provide enough context to explain relevance.
- Keep documentation such as minutes, instructions, and agreements findable and accessible to ensure transparency and track progress.
-
Integrate leadership direction with community input
- While leadership and accountability are essential, a collaborative approach is equally critical for community-built initiatives like arXiv.
- Successful projects in our domain require both leadership to drive processes forward and active collaboration and listening to harness the power of the community.
- Clearly define roles and responsibilities, ensuring there’s a balance between authority, influence, and advisory roles. Leadership must also be flexible and willing to test new ideas, adapt, and continuously improve.
- Leadership should actively listen to staff concerns, especially during periods of disruption, and prioritize ongoing communication to keep everyone informed.
-
Focus on continuous improvement
- Encourage open, honest, but respectful feedback from all levels of the organization. This helps the working environment evolve, fostering a resilient and mature organization.
- Create an environment where admitting mistakes is accepted and respected, seeing them as opportunities for improvement.
- While reflecting on the past is valuable, it’s equally important to focus on the future.
-
Center people and inclusion
- Understand what motivates individuals within the organization and identify shared values. Build a shared vision, organize priorities around these values and the mission, and prepare a flexible strategy that can evolve as circumstances change.
- Support and enable growth. Recognize that as people grow, they may move on, and while this can be sad, they may become some of your best ambassadors.
- Take time to assess whether communication and decision-making mechanisms are clear, and consider any ethical or cultural challenges. Are talents and skills being utilized effectively?
- Pay special attention to the differences in power, authority, and influence in the community. Make sure expectations, responsibilities, and accountability are clear and regularly revisited. It’s essential that everyone not only understands what is expected but also has the means, conditions, and authority to meet those expectations.
-
Outline roles, responsibilities, and rules with room for flexibility to foster organizational resilience
- Consider roles and responsibilities carefully when establishing or reconfiguring teams, but remain flexible enough to recognize when adjustments are needed.
- Build resilience by ensuring that no individual is irreplaceable — prepare for life events such as vacations, illness, promotions, or retirements. A bus number of one is not sustainable for an organization.
- Have a mechanism to manage resources and capacities — volunteers are hugely valuable, but there comes a point when certain roles require more than voluntary commitment.
- While clear rules and fixed processes are helpful, especially during times of change, flexibility is key. Be willing to pilot new ideas, correct course, and continuously improve.